Contact Us | Jobs And Opportunities | Register/Log-in |

The Global Land Tool Network (GLTN) contributes to the
implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve
secure land rights for all. Read more...

Home arrow Forum

May 17th, 2012

Forum
Login
If you do not have an account, please click here to register
Stay Connected
           
   
Facts
Forum  


 User post
 Moderator post or edited by moderator
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Stein Holden

 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Q3: - 2009/04/29 16:08 GMT Is slum development primarily a question of funding and priorities? Is a blueprint approach going to work or is there a need to finetune the approach to the specific local conditions? And can the problem be like trying to get the water out of a boat that is leaking badly?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q3: - 2009/04/30 08:10 GMT Actually the analogy you give to slums is very fitting, but then countries have no choice but to reflect back and see how to mend the boat before they drown in the sinking boat. Slum development is not only about finances and priorities but several interventions which must be coordinated in order to move towards a goal of improved living conditions of slum dwellers.Some of these interventions will be securing of tenure for the slum dwellers, provision of essential services,improvements of structures,organising slum dwellers into cohesive entities that can be used as spring board for implementation among other. But as these shot term measures are being carried out countries need to start evolving long term plans. This is where I refer for assistance to the countries. The blue print framework would be form of guidelines to assist countries come up with their own localised plan.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Stein Holden

 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Q3: - 2009/04/30 09:23 GMT Very useful comments. If the analogy gives some useful intuition, here are some additional ideas on it: If it is more about mending the leaking boat, and providing dry clothes for those inside the boat, it may also be others outside the boat that are about to drown and want to get in (=rural-urban migration), rather than throwing some out (=eviction), but how many can the boat carry safely? The better the boat is mended and improved, the more people want to get on board. More boats need to be built. And if the climate change causes bigger storms and waves this increases the risk that the boat will sink and evacuation will be needed (=resettlement).
So the need for evacuation may in such cases imply tenure security, just like evictions would, unless good plans are made and clear alternatives provided. And the necessary funding is established...
Related to eviction, could some minimum compensation standards be established?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Stein Holden

 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Q3: - 2009/04/30 09:23 GMT Very useful comments. If the analogy gives some useful intuition, here are some additional ideas on it: If it is more about mending the leaking boat, and providing dry clothes for those inside the boat, it may also be others outside the boat that are about to drown and want to get in (=rural-urban migration), rather than throwing some out (=eviction), but how many can the boat carry safely? The better the boat is mended and improved, the more people want to get on board. More boats need to be built. And if the climate change causes bigger storms and waves this increases the risk that the boat will sink and evacuation will be needed (=resettlement).
So the need for evacuation may in such cases imply tenure security, just like evictions would, unless good plans are made and clear alternatives provided. And the necessary funding is established...
Related to eviction, could some minimum compensation standards be established?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q3: - 2009/04/30 17:58 GMT In most countries slums occur on unhygenic or non-inhabitable regions of cities - usually on the banks of sewage channels or on land aroud waste dumping stations or on highway sides, or in other marginal lands. Such lands are commercially or otherwise of no use to the urban system and that is why poor environment refugees can occupy such places quite a long time.

Therefore, permitting people to continue (providing tenure/rights to the land which they occupy) will be a crime against humanity.

Rehabilitation shall be the first priority in slum eradication programmes. Simultaneously temporary supports such as drinking water provisions, toileteries, hospital facilities, etc are immediate needs of many of the slums.

In these circumstances, your observations were correct that humans globally need comprehensive plans to deal with the issue of poverty. Slums are not the real problmes, but are symptoms of serious errors in the political governance, education, social structure, culture and agricultural policies of a nation.

Truly democratic nations with globally accountable governance can strengthen people regionally and thus can face these difficult challenges easily. Global supports in economic planning and policy makings of countries at the international and national levels are essential to tackle such such issues.

No doubt, the problems of poverty will be aggravated in future due to climatic changes as well. All nations need to plan ahead in this reagrd.

However, if strong political will emerge in developed countries to persuade their citizens to reduce consumption rates and to find funds to help poor or low income countries, fundings for rehabilitation of slum dwellers can be avoided gradually.

Paucity of funds alone is not the reason for people continue to live in noninhabitable urban surroundings. It is also due to lack of strong political will of poor nations, absence of strong global policies, and no interventions of strong nations in the democratization process of poor countries. Humans have collective responsibilities in solving all environmental issues, including that of povery.

Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/04/30 18:20 GMT
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q3: - 2009/05/06 15:40 GMT [b]Stein Holden wrote:[/b]
[quote]... unless good plans are made and clear alternatives provided. And the necessary funding is established...
Related to eviction, could some minimum compensation standards be established?[/quote]

When talking about management, a holistic solution needs to be developed. This would go beyond the borders of the urban into the peripheries and the rural. A concentration of opportunity in the urban areas is a causative problem to the slum development in the urban. How about approaching finding solutions through regional development? The analogy of the boat is a good one. One has to take a boat to get supplies or whatever one lacks to the end point/ destination. How about bringing the services to the person so that s/he does not have to take the boat? The problem then starts to be solved by reducing the concentration in the destination point (active resettlement) and only the absolute required number remain in the destination point hence the boat can be sustainably mended. Decentralisation of industry and opportunity is one key aspect that has to be done pro-actively by governments including giving incentives for companies/ establishments to root in the peripheries. It is a long term solution that can be the answer to the scenario Stein Holden depicts above.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>