Contact Us | Jobs And Opportunities | Register/Log-in |

The Global Land Tool Network (GLTN) contributes to the
implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve
secure land rights for all. Read more...

Home arrow Forum

May 17th, 2012

Forum
Login
If you do not have an account, please click here to register
Stay Connected
           
   
Facts
Forum  


 User post
 Moderator post or edited by moderator
Q6: - 2009/04/15 10:31 GMT Can national laws and international agreements be developed to protect the land rights of people living in areas identified for big international food production schemes?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q6: - 2009/05/02 07:05 GMT The Daewoo example is portrayed as exploitative;the Qatar-Kenya example as more of a legitimate deal offering mutual benefits. In order to make such judgements it would be necessary to know far more about each [proposed] transaction and its impact on indigenous people: on their enjoyment of land and on their attitudes to the costs/ benefits of such deals, on the degree of their ngagement in decision-making etc.

It would also seem appropriate that there be some impartial input that evaluated the global consequences of very large scale projects. It certainly seems that the court of national/ international opinion impacted the Daewoo deal. That may not always be sufficient.

It is possible to envisage deals brokered by global/ regional institutions bringing global/ regional benefits.

All this relates to questions of Fair Trade at the macro level and raises substantial questions about the nature and objectives of global institutions. I am not sure we have a consensus about the current success of such institutions! How have they performed, for example, in relation to globally significant non-food operations like mineral extraction and energy?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q6: - 2009/05/02 07:05 GMT The Daewoo example is portrayed as exploitative;the Qatar-Kenya example as more of a legitimate deal offering mutual benefits. In order to make such judgements it would be necessary to know far more about each [proposed] transaction and its impact on indigenous people: on their enjoyment of land and on their attitudes to the costs/ benefits of such deals, on the degree of their ngagement in decision-making etc.

It would also seem appropriate that there be some impartial input that evaluated the global consequences of very large scale projects. It certainly seems that the court of national/ international opinion impacted the Daewoo deal. That may not always be sufficient.

It is possible to envisage deals brokered by global/ regional institutions bringing global/ regional benefits.

All this relates to questions of Fair Trade at the macro level and raises substantial questions about the nature and objectives of global institutions. I am not sure we have a consensus about the current success of such institutions! How have they performed, for example, in relation to globally significant non-food operations like mineral extraction and energy?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Stein Holden

 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Q6: - 2009/05/02 18:16 GMT These are difficult issues and not enough research has been carried out yet such that the discussion is based on what is accessible through the media. The World Bank has recently initiated a study of a considerable number of such large scale land acquisition projects so more information will be made availble from these not too far into the future. It is evident, however, that these types of deals are politically sensitive in the countries where land is demanded. However, it could be the case that such deals could be of benefit of these countries if they are planned carefully. International organizations like the World Bank may be able to ensure a better environmental and ethical standard in such projects.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Q6: - 2009/05/06 12:20 GMT Wherever, such projects come up, local people need to be involved through provision of shares (one of the compensation for the land they lose) of the projects so that they also get a share of the profits. Strict International and National norms shall be formulated to monitor all such projects.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.