Globally, more people now live in cities and towns than in rural areas
Africa is now the World’s fastest urbanizing region and by 2050, 55% of Africans will be living in urban areas (from 38% in 2000)
Over 90% of new urban development in Africa is taking the form of slums
About 70% of urban population in Africa presently live in slums, and yet occupy less than 10% of urban and peri-urban lands
Research shows that in Africa about 60% of GDP is created in cities and towns
Formal land registration and administration have been unable to cope with rapid urban growth and as a result, between 50-70 percent of urban land in Africa is delivered through informal practices
In Zimbabwe, on 19 May 2005, with little or no warning, the Government embarked on an Operation to 'clean-up' its cities. It was a 'crash' operation known as Operation Murambatsvina and affected over 700,000 people.
In Ghana, some 800 people also had their homes destroyed in Legion Village, Accra, in May 2006, while approximately 30,000 people in the Agbogbloshie community of Accra have been threatened with forced eviction since 2002.
In Kenya, at least 20,000 people have been forcibly evicted from neighbourhoods in or around Nairobi since 2000.
In Equatorial Guinea, at least 650 families have been forcibly evicted from their homes since 2004, when the government embarked on a programme of urban regeneration in Malabo and Bata.
In Luanda, the capital of Angola, at least 6,000 families have been forcibly evicted and have had their homes demolished since 2001.
In Sudan, more than 12,000 people were forcibly evicted from Darusalaam camp in August 2006.
58 per cent of all households in South Africa are living without security of tenure.
In Nigeria, some 2 million people have been forcibly evicted from their homes and many thousands have been made homeless since 2000.
More than 3 million Africans have been forcibly evicted from their homes since 2000.
In Trinidad and Tobago, the 1998 Regularization of Tenure Act established a Certificate of Comfort that can be used to confer security of tenure to squatters as the first step in a process designed to give them full legal title.
Some 25,000 evictions are carried out annually in New York City alone.
In Atlanta, some 30,000 people were forcibly evicted prior to the 1996 Olympic Games, while the oldest public housing project, Techwood Homes, was deliberately de-tenanted because it stood in the way of a 'sanitized corridor' running through to CNN headquarters and the city centre.
Between 40 and 70 per cent of the population of Brazil’s main cities are living in irregular settlements.
Some 720,000 people were forcibly evicted in Seoul and Inchon, Republic of South Korea, prior to the 1988 Olympic Games.
The number of people forcibly evicted to give way to dams in India alone since 1950 has been estimated at 50 million.
The economic boom in China has significantly reduced security of tenure. Rapid urban growth is a major cause of forced evictions. 1.7 million people have reportedly been evicted in Beijing (China) in the run-up to the 2008 Olympic Games.
Everyone who returned to Phnom Penh, Cambodia, after the collapse of the Khmer Rouge regime was a squatter.
In Sri Lanka, large numbers of those displaced by the tsunami in late 2004 are still prevented from returning to their original homes and lands.
The Government of Myanmar forcibly evicted more than 1 million residents of Yangon, Rangoon.
An restitution programme in Kosovo has provided legal clarity regarding tenure and property rights to 29,000 disputed residential properties in the province since 2000.
Re:Payment for environmental services - 2009/05/15 18:05 GMTI am sorry if I misunderstood you. I have very high respect for Gandhi and his many achievements. But he may not have been expert in economics or been able to forecast the developments in economics after his death. I am also an adirer of Nobel Price winner in economics, Amartya Sen, who has focused a lot on equity issues and the economics of destitution, e.g. with his books on Poverty and Famines, with the entitlement approach, and Equality of What. The economics of being poor is also my field of economics. Economics fundamenally about management of resources when you face constraints. So it is a big misconception to think that economics is only about getting rich.
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Thank you very much for the kind and thought-provoking reply to my last message.
I have no mis conception, You are perfectly right that "economics is not only about getting rich"; but Gandhiji's observation was that among the different goals of economics, this goal of "becoming rich" is making problems to the world and economists are not at all working seriously on the issue. Gandhiji wanted to direct economists to emphasize some other goals seriously.
Prof Amarthya Sen's contributions on equity issues and the economics of destitution are great but not exactly in the Gandhian way.
Gandhiji was of course not an "expert in economics". But he was a social scientist of high wisdom and extra ordinary farsightedness so that he could "forecast the developments in economics" that affect people even today.
Gandhian thoughts on 'economics' are not yet thoroughly explored by economists or ecologists; it is a treasure of 'ecofriendly' management of natural and financial resources for global sustainable development and sustainable happiness of all - is not 'utopian'. Gandhiji was a 'sociologist' a 'political economist' and a sage!
I am sure that you are well aware than me that "science is not the truth, but an infinite search of the truth" and in its pursuit, scientists have to 'review' the process every time.
I hope a proper review of 'Gandhian thoughts' has high relevance in developing better economic concepts than the currently available concepts on social development.
Gandhiji was a 'wholist' and his holistic approaches to social development, emphasizing the spiritual and moral reasons also as significant to sustainable development of nations are yet to be properly explored.
I am a student of biology (ecology) and what wonders me is that even in those primitive days his wisdom enabled him to predict and forcast social issues that challenge humanity in the midst of 'eco-catastrophe' of today; Gandhiji visualized lack of character among leaders, lack of will power of the the political leadership and the poor self-discipline to sacrifice selfishness among people, as the root cause of all social economic crises (including terrorism!). It was his interference that saved a big country of utterly poor people from terrorist turns and paved them a new way of non-violence to a truly democratic process of growth. Of course, India is not following Gandhian views completely, but the directions are still there in the country's grass root processes and that is why it is not like others in the same region. Economists have to analyzed the facts differently.
As a student of ecology, I think that all ecological issues originates ultimately from social failures (irresponsibility or ignorance of people and their leaders - ignoring certain sacrifices to achieve sustainable goals).
I hope your interest in the "economics of being poor" shall definitely take you more deeper into to Gandhian thoughts.
Thanking you and expecting more of your criticisms,
With respect and esteemed regards,
Dr Ray
Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/05/17 17:50 GMT
Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/05/17 18:04 GMT
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Joseph George Ray
Re:Payment for environmental services - 2009/05/17 16:41 GMT
Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/05/18 07:36 GMT
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Stein Holden
Re:Payment for environmental services - 2009/05/17 18:20 GMTDear Joseph I am sure Gandhi had many great ideas and I must admit that my knowledge of them is limited. From this last reply I think I see that his thoughts were related to one or several branches in economics that deal with these issues and have a set of concepts, theories and models that analyze these problems. These range from public choice theory to variants of political economy and new development economics. Concepts like moral hazard, adverse selecton, rent-seeking, corruption, bribery, nepotism, elite capture, resource curse, collective action failures, and other institutional failures, and use of game theory as an important tool for analyzing such problem issues is a broad and rapidly expanding field or rather fields in economics. Such issues are clearly also highly relevant to keep in mind when trying to design PES schemes to internalize environmental externalities and may very well be the major reason why they may fail. But I am not yet seeing what Gandhi added to this that is not captured in these theories. Perhaps he just talked about the same phenomena but used different words?
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Joseph George Ray
Re:Payment for environmental services - 2009/05/18 06:27 GMT
Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/05/18 07:36 GMT
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.
I am sure that you as a good scholar in economics can very well Guide researchers to work out "what Gandhi added to or that is not captured in the new economic theories" such as "moral hazard, adverse selecton, rent-seeking, corruption, bribery, nepotism, elite capture, resource curse, collective action failures, and other institutional failures".
I feel that Gandhiji had addressed all these issues in his theories and probably economic scholars who were pioneers in these theories might have either influenced Gandhiji (Gandhiji was a voraceous reader -in his works one can see quotes from world classics as well as all the great authors of his period)or Gandhiji might have influenced economists in developing such theories.
Gandhiji wanted to avoid the misconception of the term civilization:
He said "Civilization seeks to increase bodily comforts, but it fails miserably in doing so" and redefined civilization:
"Civilization is that mode of conduct which points out to man the path of duty. Performance of duty and observance of morality are convertible terms. To observe morality is to attain mastery over our mind and our passions. So doing, we know ourselves". If follow Gandhian thoughts, to become civilized we need to limit our worldly desires - limit our needs and to be spiritual in dealing with worldly affairs. Ecological findings also direct humans to follow the same pursuit in managing the earth beautifully and sustainably.
Albert Einstein wrote on Gandhiji:
"The moral influence which he has exercised upon thinking people through the civilized world may be far more durable than would appear likely in our present age, with its exaggeration of brute force...... We are fortunate and should be grateful that fate has bestowed upon us so luminous a contemporary - a beacon to the generations to come".
Romain Rolland wrote:
"Gandhi is not only for India a hero of national history, whose legendary memory will be enshrined in the millenial epoch .. He has renewed, for all the peoples of the West, the message of Christ, forgotten or betrayed. He has inscribed his name among the sages and saints of humanity; and the radiance of his figure has penetrated into all the regions of the earth"
I find, the moral questions that Gandhiji highlighted in civilized human life and the political theories which he invented for the true development of a modern nation have high applications in environmental problem solving, including 'Payment of Environmental Services'.
If I were a student of economics I would have requested you to guide me to work on these issues; I am now in my age of forty six and very busy with academic schedules; but still is interested in such interdisciplinary thoughts and investigations, though not sure how much I am capable of doing in the line.
You as a good economist interested in environment friendly resource management, may kindly direct students on the theme. I am only happy to assist you in in the matter; may be in identifying qualified youth to pursue such researches and to monitor their studies here under your guidance.
Thanking you,
With respect and esteemed regards,
Ray
Post edited by: methikalamray, at: 2009/05/18 07:45 GMT
| | The administrator has disabled public write access.