Contact Us | Jobs And Opportunities | Register/Log-in |

The Global Land Tool Network (GLTN) contributes to the
implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve
secure land rights for all. Read more...

Home arrow Forum

May 17th, 2012

Forum
Login
If you do not have an account, please click here to register
Stay Connected
           
   
Facts
Forum  


 User post
 Moderator post or edited by moderator
Village development vs. urban development - 2009/05/06 18:20 GMT The question whether village development is a solution to urban malaise (slums, ghettoes, etc.) is in some sense analogous to what Dr APJ Abdul Kalam (former President of India) coined PURA (Providing Urban Amenities in Rural Areas) and wanted India to achieve by 2020.

The question whether village development can serve as a major land management or rural development tool for resolving the urban slum problems needs to be seen from two perspectives: Rural, and Urban.

Village development per se is village development, which implies development of everything associated with such development of which land management is crucial. Land management is only one of the rural development tools and I do not wish to treat the two as synonyms. Village development in the sense of PURA may reduce migration of villagers to urban areas for employment, education, healthcare, etc. But village development is no substitute to urban development, which is altogether different. The rise of slums and ghettoes in urban areas has more to do with urban planning. As such it should be addressed as a separate problem. But village development in the sense of PURA in the future can certainly bring down further pressure on urban areas, particularly in the sense of the urban infrastructure facilities needed for an easy, decent, and stress-free urban life.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Village development vs. urban development - 2009/05/06 18:40 GMT Urbanization of rural areas is a wild dream. Consumerist urban lifestyle cannot not be a true developmental concept for rural areas.

What is required is that the rural illiterate shall be provided minimum assured wages while they reach urban systems; moreover, they shall be properly supported through institutional means for finding suitable employments while they reach the urban areas; social security also shall be provided.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Village development vs. urban development - 2009/05/07 14:27 GMT Rural development is not an answer to slum eradication.

Rural development is a strategy in decreasing urban migration.

Why people choose to settle in a city ?

For better employment, income, education, medical facilities and allied services.

If these services can be made available in rural areas with high quality and standard people will choose such rural areas as their home destination.

These are just of facility, availability and affordability.

Environmental pollution and scarce urban utility services made the possibility more real.

But slum dwellers are essential for city life. They must be settled in the city neighborhood for their jobs and income.

The distant village people can not serve the big city people timely.

So urban resettlement for slum dwellers could be a more pragmatic option.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.