Contact Us | Jobs And Opportunities | Register/Log-in |

The Global Land Tool Network (GLTN) contributes to the
implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve
secure land rights for all. Read more...

Home arrow Forum

May 17th, 2012

Forum
Login
If you do not have an account, please click here to register
Stay Connected
           
   
Facts
Forum  


 User post
 Moderator post or edited by moderator
General views - 2008/09/13 18:18 GMT I am Neezla, a PhD candidate at the University of East London. First of all, congratulations for holding this e-forum, it seems an excellent opportunity to express not only professional or academic views on the subject but also the possibility to put across the ‘voices’ of those women that appear very common and yet significantly representing the centre of this project. The setting out of the merged list of criteria is certainly a major part towards making land rights practical and effective to the many women from different backgrounds whose lives can be potentially enhanced in several ways. Based on my fieldwork in Mauritius on women’s inheritance, land/property rights, it is observed that the factor of information availability and dissemination is crucial but the issues of ‘how’, ‘where’ and ‘what’ require particular considerations according to the specific categories of people. While the elements of the criteria framework require a certain form of prioritisation, it is also perhaps necessary to allow the criteria to operate with some degree of flexibility in order to be productive as a whole. Some circumstances may demand that participation and empowerment of NGOs, for instance, should be the pre-requisite action. Likewise, while legal reforms can be the way forward to achievement and towards creating a pro-human rights environment, however, given the prevalence of legal pluralism in many societies (or every society), state law reforms or statutory enactments may not be fully effective on their own. There are several important religious, cultural and socio-economic issues that require careful consideration at an early stage. In certain contexts, preliminary statutory regulations may be necessary prior to any further substantive actions. The possibility of combining some relevant parts of the criteria that are closely related and interdependent may be considered.

Pleasant ‘journey’ to all!
  | | The topic has been locked.
diane dumashie

 
Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:General views - 2008/09/14 15:21 GMT Good day Neezla

Great you are currently undertaking your Phd studies, and we all look forward to your continued participation with us on this train ride, over the next 4 weeks!

Your comments are most valid, turning in particular to your observation of the necessity to allow criteria to operate flexibly, but also as you later point out sep- by - step. I see this as a very good point and one that can be considered for the development of the eventual evaluation framework. Thank you for this.

Look forward to hearing from you further.

Best wishes
dd
  | | The topic has been locked.