Contact Us | Jobs And Opportunities | Register/Log-in |
  • Search Content

  • Search Options

Search

The Global Land Tool Network (GLTN) contributes to the
implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve
secure land rights for all. Read more...

Home

May 21st, 2012

Login
If you do not have an account, please click here to register
Stay Connected
           
   
Facts
Merged criteria

1. INFORMATION/DATA
The basis of any tool is information. This information must be well thought out and take into consideration the realities of women’s lives to provide a gendered basis on which to build/implement the tool. The other aspect of information, namely information dissemination, speaks more to Furthermore, the tool must promote information dissemination that is open and transparent to ensure all know, understand and may utilize the tool.
Collection:

  • Does the tool provide for/rely on gender disaggregated data? Is gender analysis utilized in developing/implementing the tool?
  • Does the data relied upon take into consideration women unique situations and the fact they are non-homogenous?
  • Is data recorded in a way that it is easily understood and popular?

Dissemination:

  • Is it widely disseminated? What is the communication strategy?
  • Does the information transfer from bottom to top and from top to bottom?
  • Is the information clear and does it empower persons to utilize/understand tool/rights?

2. PARTICIPATION AND EMPOWERMENT
In order to be effective, large scale land tools need to take into consideration (to the extent possible) the needs and interests of all stakeholders. Importantly, this can be achieved through providing a role for all stakeholders, from community members to government officials, through participation methodologies and innovative capacity building.

  • Does the tool build mutual beneficent relationships/alliances between among power brokers and beneficiaries of tool.
  • Does the tool provide training for all using/implementing/benefitting from it.
  • Does the tool provide collective buy in from multiple stakeholders? Is this buy in sustainable?

3. LAND GOVERNANCE
Land governance concerns the rules, processes and organizations through which decisions are made about access to land and its use, the manner in which the decisions are implemented, and the way that competing interests in land are managed. It encompasses statutory, customary and religious institutions. It includes state structures such as land agencies, courts and ministries responsible for land, as well as non-statutory actors such as traditional bodies. It covers both the legal and policy framework for land.
Legal:

  • Overall, does the tool adopt a human rights approach/framework?
  • Does the tool provide for a continuum of rights? Does the tool capture full range of claims - layers of claims (owner/usufructory), tenure types(formal/informal), etc?
  • Does the tool add to/provide a bundle of rights?
  • Is the tool adaptive to a variety of land types with the same effect for women?
  • Does the tool take into consideration all existing laws relevant to land and women’s personal status? Where those laws have negative effects for women, does the tool provide an opportunity for change?
  • Does the tool offer ongoing legal protection for women?

Political:

  • Does the tool impact positively on all bodies responsible for land management, in particular land agencies, ministries, courts and traditional structures?
  • Is the tool supportive of/provide for political will within these bodies? General political will?
  • Is the decision making process within the tool transparent, participatory and inclusive?
  • In particular, are the poor and marginalized stakeholders/beneficiaries involved in decision making and planning? Are women involved?
  • Does the tool provide a mechanism for dispute resolution between all vested interests?
  • Does the tool redistributive of land? Does the tool provide an avenue for economic and power redistribution?

     

4. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL
When developing/implementing a large scale land tool, considerations must be taken regarding the social and cultural realities for all stakeholders, in particular for beneficiaries.

  • Does the tool adapt to or where necessary to ensure equity and equality, address and amend customary and/or religious laws impacting on land rights for all, women?
  • Does the tool consider/adapt to the social realities/dynamics of beneficiaries/stakeholders?

     

5. SCALE AND SUSTAINABILITY In order to ensure that the tool in question is able to continue to ensure equity in land at a larger scale, certain criteria must be met.

  • • Is the tool able to have a larger impact?
  • Is the tool implemented/applied consistently? (not ad hoc).
  • Is there engagement with the state and between all levels on an ongoing basis?